Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586293›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Endovascular Therapy for Isolated Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion.

Katrine Falkesgaard, Jakob N Hedegaard, Jonas Jensen, Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi, Rolf A Blauenfeldt, Claus Z Simonsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrine FalkesgaardDepartment of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.
Jakob N HedegaardDanish Center for Health Services Research Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark.
Jonas JensenDepartment of Neuroradiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.
Thabele M Leslie-MazwiDepartment of Neurology University of Washington Seattle WA.
Rolf A BlauenfeldtDepartment of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.
Claus Z SimonsenDepartment of Neurology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-0266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Guidelines on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke do not include isolated cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) occlusions. The effect of treating these lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes between patients with isolated cICA occlusions to patients who underwent endovascular therapy due to a level of occlusion supported by guidelines. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 1162 patients who underwent endovascular therapy. Of these, 115 had an isolated cICA occlusion. Univariate analysis of baseline characteristics and outcome measured by the modified Rankin scale 90 days after endovascular therapy were compared between patients with isolated cICA occlusion, those with tandem occlusions, and those with occlusions of the middle cerebral artery/top of the internal carotid artery (first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery). To adjust for confounders, an inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Results: Patients with isolated cICA occlusions were more likely men (67.8% versus 50.9%; Conclusion: Patients with isolated cICA occlusions and first segment of the middle cerebral artery/intracranial internal carotid artery occlusions differ in sex, smoking status, and rate of atrial fibrillation. Patients with isolated cICA occlusions have lower reperfusion rates, worse outcome, and a higher mortality rate.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokecarotid occlusionendovascular thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID41586293
PMCPMC12778569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.