ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
MINT Registry: Rationale and Study Design.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-pass efficacy with simplicity: Macrowire-only direct aspiration technique in posterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy: A Video Description.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
- Macrowire for intracranial thrombectomy: An early experience of a new device and technique for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical thrombectomy has become the standard of care for treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large-vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from last known normal time. Multiple different techniques for mechanical thrombectomy have been described, including a direct aspiration first-pass technique and stent retriever thrombectomy. With a direct aspiration first-pass technique, classically, a large-bore aspiration catheter is delivered over a microcatheter and microwire to the clot. Recently, a novel macrowire has been introduced as a potential alternative to the use of microwire-microcatheter to allow the delivery of the aspiration catheter. The aim of this study is to develop a multicenter registry comparing delivery of an aspiration catheter for intracranial thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to emergent large-vessel occlusion over a macrowire in comparison with traditional use of microcatheter and microwire. Methods: MINT (Macrowire for Intracranial Thrombectomy) is a multicenter, observational study currently enrolling patients with large-vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy using a macrowire to deliver the aspiration catheter to the intracranial occlusion. All the participating sites will screen and report cases on a monthly basis. The decision to use the macrowire and various aspiration catheters is at the discretion of the interventionalist. Results: We will collect patient's clinical, demographic, and radiographic data. In addition, we plan to collect procedure variables and postprocedure clinical and imaging data. Outcomes include successful delivery of the reperfusion catheter to the clot interface, time taken from groin access to first pass, and a bailout strategy for thrombectomy in cases where this is not feasible. Conclusion: The MINT registry will add to our understanding of safety and efficacy of this novel macrowire in intracranial thrombectomy. This registry will also highlight and allow for understanding in workflow improvements from simplifying setup and possibly cost effectiveness of this technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.