Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586247›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Edible evolution: the significance of food additives in shaping human health.

Avery Erickson, Shreya Bellampalli, Arthur Beyder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avery EricksonIdaho College of Osteopathic Medicine, Meridian, ID, United States.
Shreya BellampalliEnteric Neuroscience Program (ENSP), Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Arthur BeyderEnteric Neuroscience Program (ENSP), Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

Mechanisms of osmosensing in GI enteroendocrine cellsF30DK138638 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Shreya Bellampalli · 2024 to 2026
$149k
NIDDK NIH HHS F30 DK138638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human diets have transitioned through distinct stages, from foraging to agriculture, domestication, and industrialization, that progressively altered food composition, availability, and ecological context. While these shifts enhanced food security and shelf life, they also narrowed dietary diversity and layered non-nutritive components ranging from salt and fermentation by-products to synthetic dyes, preservatives, artificial flavors, and non-caloric sweeteners onto ancestral nutritional frameworks. This review traces the historical integration of such compounds, situating them within broader dietary transitions to highlight how technological innovations gradually distanced human diets from their evolutionary origins. Drawing on nutritional anthropology, archaeogenomics, and ecological perspectives, we examine how these changes reshaped gut health, microbial diversity, and long-term disease risk. By framing non-nutritive additives within the long arc of dietary evolution, this perspective provides context for understanding the rise of modern, ultra-processed food systems and underscores the importance of integrating evolutionary and ecological evidence into contemporary nutrition and gastrointestinal research.

Indexed as

gut healthgut microbiomenutrigenomicsnutritional anthropologynutritional ecology

Identifiers

PMID41586247
PMCPMC12823509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.