ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The nutritional environment and food access of female athletes at HBCUs: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Female student-athletes attending Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) may encounter distinct challenges related to food access, particularly when their campuses are situated in areas with limited food availability. This study assessed food security (FS) and explored the lived experiences of HBCU female student-athletes regarding their food environments and access to nutrition. Methods: This qualitative study used a semi-structured interview protocol derived from quantitative data. Participants were 10 HBCU female athletes (age = 19 ± 1 years) living in on-campus dormitories; recruited after completing a quantitative study examining energy needs. The three-part semi-structured interview protocol included questions about personal experiences surrounding food access and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Six-Item Short Form of the Food Security Survey Module. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Three coders analyzed data using the consensual qualitative research tradition. Trustworthiness was established using member checking, multi-analyst triangulation, and external auditing. Results: FS status was evenly distributed among participants (five food secure, five food insecure). Four domains emerged: (1) on-campus living, (2) personal factors, (3) convenience, and (4) nutritional awareness. Participants described navigating limited cooking resources, inconsistent cafeteria offerings, and time constraints that influenced their food choices. While food sources were available both on and off campus, many participants expressed that these options did not consistently align with their preferences or nutritional needs. Reflections on dietary habits revealed varying levels of nutritional awareness and a desire for more tailored guidance. Conclusion: The findings suggest that while food options exist within HBCU campuses and surrounding communities, they may not fully support the unique needs of female student-athletes. Institutional stakeholders, including administrators, athletic trainers, and coaches, may consider collaborative efforts to enhance food access and nutritional support. This could include increasing awareness of community resources (e.g., SNAP, food banks), revisiting dormitory policies related to cooking, and expanding access to nutrition education. These insights underscore the importance of contextually responsive strategies to promote student-athlete well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.