Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Extracting structured data from unstructured breast imaging reports with transformer-based models.

Mikel Carrilero-Mardones, Jorge Pérez-Martín, Francisco Javier Díez, Iñigo Bermejo Delgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mikel Carrilero-MardonesDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Pérez-MartínDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier DíezDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Iñigo Bermejo DelgadoData Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Structured clinical data is essential for research and informed decision-making, yet medical reports are frequently stored as unstructured free text. This study compared the performance of BERT-based and generative language models in converting unstructured breast imaging reports into structured, tabular data suitable for clinical and research applications. Methods: A dataset of 286 anonymised breast imaging reports in Spanish was translated into English and used to evaluate five transformer-based models pre-trained in medical data: BlueBERT, BioBERT, BioMedBERT, BioGPT and ClinicalT5. Two natural language processing approaches were explored: classification of 19 categorical variables (e.g. diagnostic technique, report type, family history, BI-RADS category, tumour shape and margin) and extractive question answering of four entities (patient age, patient history, parenchymal distortion or asymmetries, and tumour size). Multiple fine-tuning strategies and input configurations were tested for each model, and performance was evaluated using accuracy and macro F1 scores. Results: BioGPT demonstrated the best performance in classification tasks, achieving an overall accuracy of Conclusions: Generative models, particularly BioGPT, offer a robust and scalable approach to automating the extraction of structured information from unstructured breast imaging reports. Their superior performance, combined with their ability to handle multiple tasks concurrently, highlights their potential to reduce the manual effort required for clinical data curation and to enable the efficient integration of imaging data into research and clinical workflows.

Indexed as

BERT modelsBI-RADSbreast cancerbreast imagingclassificationextractive question answeringgenerative modelsstructured reporting

Identifiers

PMID41586210
PMCPMC12827707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.