Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586209›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Timing is survival: modeling how earlier calls improve cardiac arrest outcomes.

Marius Ole Johansen, Rune Johan Krumsvik, Vegard Slettvoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marius Ole JohansenFaculty of Psychology, Department of Education, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Rune Johan KrumsvikFaculty of Psychology, Department of Education, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Vegard SlettvollFaculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decreases by 5%-12% for every minute of delay in treatment. Ambulance response times vary widely across Norway, particularly between urban and rural municipalities. Advances in digital health technologies may encourage earlier patient contact with emergency services, potentially mitigating these delays. Methods: We analyzed official response time data from four Norwegian municipalities representing diverse geographic contexts (Bergen, Tokke, Lurøy, Sørfold). Using a survival decay function (Equation), we simulated changes in survival probability under scenarios where emergency calls were placed 1, 5, or 10 min earlier than observed. Results: Baseline survival probabilities varied substantially across municipalities, from 47.7% in Bergen (mean response 10.2 min) to 9.3% in Lurøy (32.8 min). Simulated earlier calls produced marked gains: in Bergen, survival increased from 47.7% to 68.6% with a five-minute advance; in Sørfold, from 19.4% to 27.9%; and in Tokke, from 29.9% to 43.1%. Even modest improvements (1-2 min) yielded meaningful survival benefits. Conclusions: Geographic disparities in emergency response times strongly influence survival after cardiac arrest. Wearables and AI-based monitoring cannot predict cardiac arrest but may promote earlier recognition of abnormal physiological states and timelier emergency calls. If widely adopted, such technologies could provide substantial survival gains, particularly in rural and remote regions.

Indexed as

ambulance response timeartificial intelligencecardiac arrestsurvival simulationwearables

Identifiers

PMID41586209
PMCPMC12823829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.