ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Site-specific and time-varying Acinetobacter colonization and risk of invasive infection in critically ill patients.Infection · 2026Article
- Article
- Unveiling the role of sex as a predictor for KPC-Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in critically Ill colonized patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Impact of multisite colonization and comparative microbiological outcomes of colistin-sulbactam vs. colistin-tigecycline in CRAB hospital-acquired pneumonia: a propensity score-matched analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Among MDR bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Objectives: To identify predictors to aid in the clinical management of critically ill patients. Methods: We conducted a multicentre prospective study in Italy, enrolling patients with CRAB colonization who were admitted to ICUs between 2020 and 2023. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for CRAB infection. To account for competing risks, we used the cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Fine-Gray regression analysis, providing an accurate assessment of the risk of CRAB infection. Additionally, a logistic regression model was performed to estimate the impact of different types of critically ill patients on the risk of infection. Results: We included 564 colonized patients, and 381 (67.5%) developed a CRAB infection in the ICU. In the logistic regression model, multisite colonization (OR 2.78; 95% CI: 1.90-4.08; Conclusions: Early colonization from ICU admission, multisite colonization, CCI, mechanical ventilation and male gender are key risk factors for CRAB infection. These factors support clinicians in the management of critically ill patients with prior CRAB colonization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.