ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025
Role of Simulation Training in Hernia Surgery and Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Didactic Education in Plastic Surgery Residency: A National Survey Highlighting Variation in Curriculum Structure and Assessment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hernia surgery requires precise technical skills to ensure successful patient outcomes. Traditional surgical training methods face challenges related to patient safety and limited operative exposure. Simulation training offers a risk-free platform to develop and refine surgical skills. This study evaluates the usefulness of simulation training for surgeons in hernia surgery. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of simulation training in enhancing the surgical skills and confidence of surgeons performing hernia repair. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 44 surgical trainees undergoing simulation-based hernia surgery training. Technical skills and confidence levels were assessed before and after the training using standardized scoring systems. Participant feedback on the realism and applicability of simulation was also collected. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: Technical skill scores improved from a mean of 58.3(SD 8.4) pretraining, with a mean difference of 21.4, (95% Cl: 18.9 to 24.5, p < 0.001, effect size [Cohen's d]∼2.1). Confidence scores increased from a mean of 4.2 (SD 1.5) to 7.8 (SD 1.2), with a mean difference of 3.6 (95% Cl: 3.1 to 4.3, p < 0.001, effect size [Cohen's d}∼2.3). Over 85% of participants agreed that the simulation was realistic and beneficial for skill enhancement. Ninety-five percent recommended simulation training as a regular part of surgical education. Conclusion: In the study Simulation training significantly improves the technical proficiency and confidence of surgeons in hernia surgery. Its incorporation into surgical training programs is recommended to enhance operative readiness but further multicentric studies are needed to validate their results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.