ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025
Subxiphoid Incisional Hernia Following Cardiac Procedures: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Subxiphoid hernias are indeed an uncommon type of hernia that tend to present in the caudal aspect of a sternotomy incision, which typically enters the epigastrium. These patients have usually undergone major cardiac surgeries, like heart transplant, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or cardiac valve replacement, representing a high-risk group of patients. The purpose of the study is to identify risk factors, prevention measures, and to explore different techniques for surgical management, including whether minimal invasive surgery is superior than the conventional open approach. Material and Methods: A comprehensive search was performed on Pubmed, Sciencedirect, Scopus, and Cochrane library. The search terms included "subxiphoid hernia" and "post sternotomy hernia." Articles not in the English literature and duplicates studies were excluded. Studies regarding epigastric hernias were also excluded. All relevant articles published until 28th of February 2025 were included. Relevant references from the identified articles were also searched and included for review. Results: Particular care should be given to recognizing patient-related risk factors, preventing surgical site infections, and ensuring proper closure of the fascia. Regarding surgical management, seventeen articles were identified with 442 patients overall. 320 patients underwent open repair, while in 122 patients laparoscopic approach was achieved. Intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement was the most popular laparoscopic technique applied. Only 3 studies provided comparable results between the two approaches. A significant variety of techniques concerning both approaches was noticed in the literature. Conclusion: Excellent knowledge of the anatomical and physiological aspects of the subxiphoid region, and acknowledgement of risk factors, are essential. Minimal invasive repair of subxiphoid hernias is a feasible option, as long as defect closure and adequate mesh overlap are achieved. There are not enough data still to prove the superiority of the laparoscopic approach. Complex cases should be referred to experienced hernia surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.