ArticleJournal of reproduction & infertility
Impact of Intrauterine Growth Restriction on Fetal Cortical Brain Development: A Neurosonographic Assessment at 28-36 Weeks of Gestation.
Article in Journal of reproduction & infertility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cortical folding during fetal brain development reflects neural maturation. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) may disrupt this process, potentially affecting neurodevelopmental outcomes. Although ultrasound enables noninvasive sulcal assessment, so normative data and objective tools are lacking. The purpose of the current study was to assess the impact of FGR on fetal cortical development using neurosonography and establish a third-trimester nomogram for cortical maturation. Methods: This prospective study included 425 singleton pregnancies (330 appropriate-for-gestational-age [AGA], 54 symmetrical FGR, and 41 asymmetrical FGR) at 28-36 weeks. Conducted at a Tehran tertiary center (2023-2024), the study included cases with normal anatomy and negative aneuploidy screening. Neurosonographic parameters including Sylvian fissure (SF), insula, parieto-occipital fissure (POF), cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) width, and ventricular diameter were measured and the ratios calculated relative to biparietal diameter (BPD). ANOVA and post-hoc tests were applied and statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: No significant differences in neurosonographic ratios ( Conclusion: While absolute sulcal measurements vary with head size in FGR, biometric adjustments (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.