ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Neurological adverse events of ROS1 inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: data from the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ROS1 inhibitors play a critical role in the treatment of ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although agents such as Crizotinib, Ceritinib, Lorlatinib, Entrectinib, and Repotrectinib have demonstrated strong efficacy and intracranial activity, their neurological safety profiles remain insufficiently characterized in real-world settings. This study aimed to evaluate the neurological adverse events (AEs) of ROS1 inhibitors using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: We conducted a pharmacovigilance analysis of FAERS reports from 2011Q4 to 2024Q4. Disproportionality analysis was used to detect potential AE signals, followed by time-to-onset and logistic regression analyses to assess the onset timing and mortality risk associated with neurological AEs. Results: A total of 7,296 AE reports related to ROS1 inhibitors were identified. Neurological AEs were prominent, with distinct patterns across drug generations. Common events included dysgeusia, dysarthria, cognitive disorder, and taste disturbance. Novel inhibitors such as Lorlatinib, Entrectinib, and Repotrectinib showed earlier onset of neurotoxicity, whereas older agents (Crizotinib and Ceritinib) were associated with delayed or cumulative neurological events. Despite stronger neurotoxicity signals, Entrectinib demonstrated a relatively favorable safety profile with fewer fatal outcomes. Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence that newer ROS1 inhibitors exhibit earlier but generally manageable neurological AEs. Clinicians should implement early neurotoxicity monitoring and individualized risk assessment to ensure safe and effective targeted therapy for ROS1-positive NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.