ArticleData in brief2026
A comprehensive combined dataset on
Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we present a combined image dataset created from two distinct plant species: Hibiscus and Tea leaf. The dataset consists of high-resolution images of leaves from both species, captured using a SONY α7 II DSLR camera and a OnePlus 7T lubricant Tea Leaf dataset includes images categorized into five disease classes: Algal Leaf Spot, Brown Blight, Grey Blight, Red Leaf Spot, and Healthy, while the Hibiscus Leaf dataset includes images labeled across eight conditions, including citrus spot, fungal infection, mild edge damage, and healthy foliage. To ensure balanced representation and address class imbalances, extensive data augmentation techniques-such as flipping, rotation, zooming, shifting, noise addition, and brightness adjustment-were applied, resulting in a total of 1,413 combined original images and 13,000 augmented images. The ConvNextTiny deep learning model was fine-tuned on this combined dataset to classify the various leaf conditions, achieving an overall accuracy of 96%. This demonstrates the model's robust performance and high discriminatory power across the diverse set of leaf diseases and conditions. This experiment highlights the utility of combining multiple plant species into a single dataset and utilizing a lightweight yet effective model like ConvNextTiny for plant disease classification. The resulting dataset, along with the model and training scripts, is publicly available to facilitate further research in plant pathology, computer vision, and smart farming applications, enabling more accurate and efficient early-stage disease detection for both Hibiscus and Tea plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.