Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586073›Full record

ArticleData in brief2026

Data from three experiments on auditory attention and distraction in autistic and nonautistic adults.

Lejla Alikadic, Jan Philipp Röer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lejla AlikadicDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455 Witten, Germany.
Jan Philipp RöerDepartment of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 50, 58455 Witten, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we describe a combined dataset from three experiments on auditory attention and distraction in young adult individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and nonautisitic individuals. In Experiment 1, we investigated the effects of steady-state, changing-state, and auditory deviant sounds on visual-verbal serial recall with list length adjusted individually to each participant. In Experiment 2, we investigated the effects of low- and high-intensity single-channel, dual-channel, and multi-channel speech on visual-verbal serial recall with a fixed list length of eight to-be-remembered items. Both serial position and cross-trial performance data are available for Experiments 1 and 2. In Experiment 3, we used a selective listening task with a to-be-attended relevant channel and a to-be-ignored irrelevant channel in which the own name and that of a yoked-control partner were embedded. The dataset also contains information on intellectual and language abilities (IST screening scores) and self-report autistic traits (AQ-10). The autistic group was recruited from the same participant pool, so that for many individuals, data from more than one experiment are available that can be compared with each other.

Indexed as

Auditory distractionAutismHabituationSelective attentionSemantic processingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41586073
PMCPMC12824900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.