ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Survival Benefit and Cost Effectiveness of a Future Blood-Based Diagnostic Test to Detect Cerebral Aneurysm Formation.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Thunderclap Headache in a Clinically Stable Patient: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of population-wide screening for intracranial aneurysms revisited in light of potential diagnostic developments.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cerebral aneurysms are common, but there is no blood test for their diagnosis. Cerebral aneurysms are diagnosed incidentally or upon rupture. Current diagnostic tools either are invasive or place a large financial burden on the patient. Introduction of a blood test can reduce costs and allow for additional screening. Methods: Markov decision analytic models were created for different case studies to simulate management within the US health care system. The model was run over 50 cycle-years. Probabilities, costs, and outcomes were obtained from the literature and the National Inpatient Sample database. Quality-adjusted life years were used to assess outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed for different risk factors, patient groups, aneurysm size, and family members. Results: A blood-based diagnostic pathway is more cost effective in patients undergoing watchful waiting and as a screening tool in patients who may be at a higher risk. There was a 3-fold reduction in death compared with the standard of care (15.71% versus 53.10%). The cost of using a blood test per additional quality-adjusted life year gained was $34 515.13 among the watchful-waiting cohort. The threshold price was $3951. Among patients with 1 family member with an aneurysm, we observed a 10-fold reduction in death compared with the standard of care (0.21% versus 2.35%), with a threshold at $845.77. Among patients who smoke, we observed a 10-fold reduction in death compared with the standard of care (0.27% versus 3.30%) with a threshold at $1054.24. Among patients with 2 family members with an aneurysm, there was a 10-fold reduction in death compared with the standard of care (0.48% versus 5.85%) with a threshold at $1876.46. Conclusion: Introduction of a blood-based test for cerebral aneurysms would have a lifesaving effect within the US health care system while remaining cost effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.