Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41586053›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

First-Line Stent Retriever Versus Contact Aspiration or Combined Technique for Endovascular Therapy of Posterior Cerebral Artery Occlusion Stroke: The PLATO Study.

Thanh N Nguyen, Mohamad Abdalkader, Muhammad M Qureshi, Patrik Michel, Davide Strambo, Daniel Strbian, Christian Herweh, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Silja Räty, Marta Olive-Gadea and 62 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Endovascular Treatment for Basilar Artery Occlusion.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

72 authors.

Thanh N NguyenNeurology Boston Medical Center Boston MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2810-1685
Mohamad AbdalkaderRadiology Boston Medical Center Boston MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-301X
Muhammad M QureshiRadiology Boston Medical Center Boston MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2056-3308
Patrik MichelNeurology Service Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-7579
Davide StramboNeurology Service Lausanne University Hospital University of Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-2714
Daniel StrbianNeurology Helsinki University Hospital Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9095-2344
Christian HerwehNeuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9223-9662
Markus A MöhlenbruchNeuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-704X
Silja RätyNeurology Helsinki University Hospital Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-0597
Marta Olive-GadeaNeurology Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4637-1598
Marc RiboNeurology Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-043X
Marios PsychogiosBasel University Hospital University of Basel Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-414X
Urs FischerNeurology University Hospital Basel Basel Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-4051
Anh NguyenRadiology University of Basel Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9343-8276
Joji B KuramatsuNeurology University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7630-7880
David HaupenthalNeurology University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-7120
Martin KöhrmannNeurology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-9535
Cornelius DeuschlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9262-7289
Jordi Kühne EscolàDepartment of Neurology University Hospital Essen Essen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8742-0694
Jelle DemeestereDepartment of Neurosciences Experimental Neurology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-0237
Lieselotte VandewalleDepartment of Neurosciences Experimental Neurology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-3804
Shadi YaghiNeurology Rhode Island Hospital RI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0031-1004
Liqi ShuNeurology Rhode Island Hospital RI.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9784-8475
Volker PuetzNeurology University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1415-3027
Daniel P O KaiserNeuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Technische Universität Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5258-0025
Johannes KaesmacherInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Bern Inselspital University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-2289
Adnan MujanovicInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Hospital Bern Inselspital University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-7134
Dominique Cornelius MarterstockNeuroradiology University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7635-6535
Tobias EngelhornNeuroradiology University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Erlangen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-3584
Piers KleinRadiology Boston Medical Center Boston MA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7468-137X
Diogo C HaussenNeurology Grady Memorial Hospital Atlanta GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-2196
Mahmoud H MohammadenNeurology Grady Memorial Hospital Atlanta GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-9989
Isabel FragataNeuroradiology Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7037-7458
Bruno CunhaNeuroradiology Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Central Portugal.
Hend AbdelhamidNeurology Grady Memorial Hospital Atlanta GA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6678-4392
Michele RomoliNeurology and Stroke Unit Department of Neuroscience Bufalini Hospital Cesena Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8009-8543
Francesco DianaInterventional Neuroradiology Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-917X
Pekka VirtanenRadiology Helsinki University Hospital Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9547-4940
Kimmo LappalainenRadiology Helsinki University Hospital Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-2807
Jessica JesserNeuroradiology Heidelberg University Hospital Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-8828
Judith ClarkNeurology Boston Medical Center Boston MA.
Stavros MatsoukasNeurosurgery Mount Sinai Health System NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-0637
Johanna T FifiNeurosurgery Mount Sinai Health System NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-5668
Sunil A ShethNeurology McGovern Medical School at UTHealth TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-8509
Sergio Salazar-MarioniNeurology McGovern Medical School at UTHealth TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2722-7542
João Pedro MartoNeurology Hospital de Egas Moniz Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2277-5950
João Nuno RamosNeuroradiology Hospital de Egas Moniz Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental Portugal.
Milena MiszczukNeuroradiology Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7221-0096
Christoph RieglerNeurology Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-3500
Sven PoliNeurology & Stroke University of Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0286-8781
Khouloud PoliNeurology & Stroke University of Tübingen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-7023
Ashutosh P JadhavNeurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute AZ.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9454-0678
Shashvat M DesaiNeurosurgery Barrow Neurological Institute AZ.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9013-6929
Volker MausRadiology Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5097-2631
Maximilian KaederRadiology Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8324-5391
Hesham E MasoudNeurology New York Upstate Medical University NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-1499
Neil SuryadarevaNeurology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PA.
Maxim MokinNeurosurgery University of South Florida FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4270-8667
James E SieglerCooper Neurological Institute NJ.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0287-3967
Italo LinfanteMiami Neuroscience Institute FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8973-4294
Guilherme DabusMiami Neuroscience Institute FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1582-6035
Negar AsdaghiNeurology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-825X
Vasu SainiNeurology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine FL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6796-5881
Christian H NolteNeurology Experimental Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB) and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5577-1775
Eberhard SiebertNeuroradiology Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-6546
Thomas R MeinelNeurology Bern University Hospital University of Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0647-9273
Charlotte S WeylandNeuroradiology University Hospital RWTH Aachen Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-7854
Uta HanningDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-8555
Lukas MeyerDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3776-638X
Raul G NogueiraNeurology University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4532-153X
Peter A RinglebNeurology Heidelberg University Hospital Germany.
Simon NagelNeurology Heidelberg University Hospital Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-6647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal reperfusion technique in patients with isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusion is uncertain. We compared clinical and technical outcomes with first-line stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or combined techniques in patients with isolated PCA occlusion. Methods: This international case-control study was conducted at 30 sites in Europe and North America and included consecutive patients with isolated PCA occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2015 to August 2022. The primary outcome was the first-pass effect (FPE), defined as expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2c/3 on the first pass. Patients treated with SR, CA, or combined technique were compared with multivariable logistic regression. Results: There were 326 patients who met inclusion criteria, 56.1% male, median age 75 (interquartile range 65-82) years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 8 (5-12). Occlusion segments were PCA-P1 (53.1%), P2 (40.5%), and other (6.4%). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered in 39.6%. First-line technique was SR, CA, and combined technique in 43 (13.2%), 106 (32.5%), and 177 (54.3%) patients, respectively; FPE was achieved in 62.8%, 42.5%, and 39.6%, respectively. FPE was lower in patients treated with first-line CA or combined technique compared with SR (CA versus SR: adjusted odds ratio 0.45 [0.19-1.06]; Conclusion: In patients with isolated PCA occlusion, SR was associated with a higher rate of FPE compared with CA or combined techniques with no difference in final successful reperfusion. Functional independence at 90 days was more likely with first-line SR compared with CA. FPE was associated with better 90-day clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

cerebrovascular disease/strokecontact aspirationischemic strokemechanical thrombectomymedium vessel occlusionposterior circulationstent retriever

Identifiers

PMID41586053
PMCPMC12778457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.