ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024
Computational Fluid Dynamics in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Subject-Specific Cerebrovascular CFD Modeling Approach Based on a Multimodal Data-Driven Boundary Calibration Framework: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative evaluation of computational fluid dynamics application development in the cardiovascular field through literature retrieval and bibliometric analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Computational Modeling of Flow in an in Vitro Cerebrovascular Model Under Pulsatile Conditions with Experimental Validation.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2026Article
- The Future of Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- A Synergistic Overview between Microfluidics and Numerical Research for Vascular Flow and Pathological Investigations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Transfer learning on physics-informed neural networks for tracking the hemodynamics in the evolving false lumen of dissected aorta.Nexus (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Focused Update on Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Introduction, Highlights, and Knowledge Gaps.Stroke · 2024Review
- The influence of contralateral circulation on computational fluid dynamics of intracranial arteries: simulated versus measured flow velocities.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Noninvasive MRA-derived fractional flow for intracranial stenosis: methodological evaluation and hemodynamic insights.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerotic disease remains high despite aggressive medical therapy. While hemodynamic insufficiency appears to be a strong marker of stroke recurrence, natural history studies using various unimodal imaging modalities have shown mixed results, as they likely do not adequately capture the complex local hemodynamic environment generated by a focal stenosis. Computational fluid dynamics, a multimodal tool used to simulate fluid flow and the interactions between fluids and surfaces, has recently been used to illustrate the complex hemodynamic environment surrounding intracranial atherosclerotic lesions and to risk-stratify patients on the basis of simulated outputs. We aimed to summarize the literature pertaining to computational fluid dynamics use in intracranial atherosclerotic disease and to describe its future potential use in generating more targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.