ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Public perception of oral and maxillofacial surgery among the general population: A cross-sectional study.
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) as a dental speciality has broadened its scope and practices in the past few decades. However, the general public at large are oblivious to the developments made within this field. Our study aims to throw light on the poor recognition of OMFS among the general population of India. Materials and Methods: An online survey involving 400 participants (209 males and 191 females; aged from 18-80), chosen at random from different parts of South India, was conducted. The participants were asked to choose the specialist they would approach for certain clinical scenarios based on their knowledge. Result: About 28.3% of the participants have heard about the OMFS speciality and are aware about the treatments they offer. Orthodontists were preferred over OMF surgeons even for wisdom tooth extractions. However, OMFS was the preferred speciality for the treatment of facial bone and jaw fractures. Conclusion: About 71.7% of the participants in our study were unaware about the scope and practices of the OMFS speciality. The general public are familiar with other dental specialities over OMFS. Improving the quality and safety of health care worldwide through the advancement of patient care, education and research in OMFS are the mission of the International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (IAOMS). The awareness of the public about our speciality and the treatments that we offer is an utmost necessity to achieve this mission. Our study is in line with this goal. We believe we can expand the reach of OMFS into the minds of the common people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.