ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Drug-induced peripheral nerve palsy: a real-world study based on FAERS data from 2004 to the third quarter of 2024.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peripheral nerve palsy is a prevalent clinical condition that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. To advance clinical practice and mitigate the risk of drug-induced peripheral nerve palsy, this study aimed to identify adverse drug reaction signals related to peripheral nerve palsy through data mining of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Timely detection of high-risk medications provides a crucial basis for enhancing the safety of clinical drug use. Methods: Adverse events (AEs) related to peripheral nerve palsy between 2004 and the third quarter of 2024 were extracted from the FAERS database. To identify potential drug safety signals associated with peripheral nerve palsy, four established pharmacovigilance statistical methods were employed: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN). Results: A total of 5,787 reports of drug-associated peripheral nerve palsy adverse events involving 1,141 drugs were identified in this analysis. Among these, natalizumab had the highest number of reported cases, followed by interferon beta-1a and dalfampridine. The most commonly implicated drug classes were antineoplastic drugs and immunosuppressants. A total of 30 drugs exhibited positive risk signals, of which 19 met the criteria for a positive signal across all four analytical algorithms. Notably, both the ROR and BCPNN methods indicated that bupivacaine, dalfampridine, natalizumab, minocycline, and ocrelizumab are among the high-risk drugs associated with peripheral nerve palsy. Conclusion: This study identified that several medications, including bupivacaine, dalfampridine, natalizumab, minocycline, and ocrelizumab, are significantly associated with an increased risk of peripheral nerve palsy. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of drug safety profiles, support the promotion of rational medication use, and provide valuable insights to inform clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.