Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Multimodal data-driven predictive model for vancomycin serum concentrations in postoperative cardiac surgery patients under cardiopulmonary bypass: a single-center retrospective study.

Pengqiang Du, Wenjin Zhang, Yujie Zhou, Taoran Li, Xinlei Qi, Wei Si, Aifeng Wang, Yongcheng Ma, Xingang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pengqiang DuHenan Key Laboratory of Individualized Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Pharmacy, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenjin ZhangNational Health Commission Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Central China Subcenter of National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Henan Cardiovascular Disease Center, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yujie ZhouHenan Key Laboratory of Individualized Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Pharmacy, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Taoran LiDepartment, Central-China Branch of National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Henan Cardiovascular Disease Center, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xinlei QiNational Health Commission Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine, Central China Subcenter of National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Henan Cardiovascular Disease Center, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei SiHenan Key Laboratory of Individualized Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Pharmacy, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Aifeng WangHenan Key Laboratory of Individualized Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Pharmacy, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yongcheng MaHenan Key Laboratory of Individualized Drug Therapy for Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Pharmacy, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Central China Fuwai Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xingang LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study analyzed the pharmacokinetic data of vancomycin in patients after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). It aimed to identify factors affecting vancomycin plasma concentrations and develop a multi-modal data-driven prediction model for these concentrations. Methods: A retrospective study included hospitalized patients who underwent cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass, received intravenous vancomycin for postoperative infection, and had plasma concentration monitoring. Patient demographic and other relevant information was collected. A dual-risk model based on the therapeutic window (10-20 mg/L) was established: ① nephrotoxicity risk group (≥20 mg/L vs. < 20 mg/L, n = 350); ② subtherapeutic concentration risk group (<10 mg/L vs. 10-20 mg/L, n = 211). Missing data were imputed using the K-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN, K = 10) to ensure data integrity. Univariate logistic regression (α = 0.10) was used for initial variable selection. LASSO regression with 10-fold cross-validation selected optimal features, and a multivariate bidirectional stepwise regression (forward-backward method, AIC criterion) built the prediction model. Model validation used forest plots, nomograms, ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Generalization performance was assessed via ten-fold cross-validation. Results: Our models demonstrated strong predictive performance for both nephrotoxicity and subtherapeutic concentration risks. In the nephrotoxicity model, creatinine clearance rate (CCr) (OR = 0.975, 95% CI: 0.965-0.984; P < 0.001) and CPB duration (OR = 1.200, 95% CI: 1.068-1.350; P = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors, achieving an AUC of 0.733 (95% CI: 0.680-0.787). For the subtherapeutic concentration risk model, age (OR = 1.035, 95% CI: 1.007-1.064; P = 0.016) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR = 0.981, 95% CI: 0.964-0.998; P = 0.032) were significant predictors, with an AUC of 0.758 (95% CI: 0.692-0.824). Both models showed good calibration (P > 0.05) on the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, with better discrimination in the low concentration risk group. DCA confirmed superior clinical net benefit for both models over full/intervention strategies. In ten-fold cross-validation, the AUC fluctuation was <5%, indicating good stability. Conclusion: These models effectively predict steady-state vancomycin concentrations in post-CPB patients. Lower CCr and longer CPB duration increase nephrotoxicity risk, while younger age and higher eGFR were associated with increased subtherapeutic concentration risk. These findings facilitate early identification of high-risk patients by clinicians, enabling timely intervention for optimized dosing regimens.

Indexed as

cardiopulmonary bypassLASSO regressionplasma concentrationpost-cardiac surgerypredictive modelvancomycin

Identifiers

PMID41585868
PMCPMC12823941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.