ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Risk for coronary artery disease among individuals with normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels <100 mg/dL are generally considered normal. We tested the controversial hypothesis that a subset of individuals with 'normal' LDL-C levels may have a non-negligible risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to inherited factors, including monogenic variants and polygenic risk scores (PGS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort from the Genomic Health Initiative at Endeavor Health, including 7880 participants without a prior diagnosis of CAD and not on statins at recruitment. Participants were stratified by baseline LDL-C levels and followed for incident CAD. The association of CAD risk with carrier status for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in Results: Among participants, 31.2 % had LDL-C <100 mg/dL (normal), 39.5 % had LDL-C 100-129 mg/dL, and 29.3 % had LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL. Over a median follow-up of 8 years, CAD was diagnosed in 5.3 %, 6.9 %, and 7.6 % of participants in these LDL-C groups, respectively. Among those with normal LDL-C, CAD incidence rose to 9.5 % in individuals with high genetic risk (P/LP variants and/or high PGS). Genetic risk was significantly associated with CAD in multivariable models ( Conclusion: Individuals with 'normal' LDL-C levels can have substantial CAD risk if they carry high genetic risk. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating genetic information into CAD risk assessment, even among those with traditionally normal lipid profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.