Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585852›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

AI-assisted rapid on-site evaluation ROSE of EUS-FNA cytopathology for pancreatic solid lesions: A two-stage deep learning approach.

Yuan Tian, Jixin Zhang, Xiaolong Rao, Bin Zhou, Xudong Zhao, Yan He, Haiqiang Sheng, Weidong Nian, Yunlong Cai, Long Rong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuan TianEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jixin ZhangPathology Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaolong RaoEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bin ZhouEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xudong ZhaoEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan HeEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Haiqiang ShengEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weidong NianEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunlong CaiEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Long RongEndoscopy Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) combined with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is crucial for diagnosing pancreatic solid lesions. However, the widespread application of ROSE faces challenges, particularly the limited availability of specialized cytopathologists for immediate interpretation. Furthermore, the inherent variability in EUS-FNA sample quality (e.g., cellularity and debris) and suboptimal smear preparation during procedures can impede reliable automated analysis.This study aimed to develop and validate a novel 2-stage deep learning-based diagnostic model for the automated analysis of EUS-FNA cytological images of pancreatic solid lesions captured using mobile phones during the ROSE process, with the goal of automating diagnosis and improving efficiency. Methods: We retrospectively collected 882 EUS-FNA cytological images from 92 patients with pancreatic solid lesions at Peking University First Hospital, captured using mobile phones, during ROSE. A 2-stage deep learning model was developed. The first stage utilized YOLOv8n-p2 for robust tissue cell detection, addressing background complexity, and enabling preprocessing steps such as cell size normalization. In the second stage, DenseNet201 was employed to classify the detected cellular regions as malignant or normal. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and testing sets. The model performance was evaluated using a dedicated test set consisting of whole images. Results: On the independent test set, the proposed 2-stage method achieved high performance in classifying images for malignancy, yielding an accuracy of 93.3%, an area under the precision-recall curve (AUC-PR) of 0.958, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.962. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the proposed AI method is comparable to that of traditional expert-involved ROSE, while offering the potential to significantly reduce diagnostic time and dependency on immediate pathologist availability. This 2-stage deep learning approach effectively analyzes variable mobile phone-captured EUS-FNA images, demonstrating its potential as an automated, AI-assisted diagnostic system for the ROSE process. It holds significant potential for clinical application, particularly in facilitating timely pancreatic cancer diagnosis in resource-constrained settings and in scenarios where on-site pathological expertise is limited.

Indexed as

CytopathologyDeep learningEUS-FNAPancreatic solid lesionsRapid on-site evaluation (ROSE)

Identifiers

PMID41585852
PMCPMC12829625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.