Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585833›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of dermatology

Efficacy of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment in Melasma.

Ayda Acar, Ilgen Ertam Sagduyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayda AcarFrom the Department of Dermatology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ilgen Ertam SagduyuFrom the Department of Dermatology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melasma is a challenging pigmentation disorder for both the patient and the physician, particularly due to its frequent recurrences and resistance to standard therapies. Light and laser-based treatments are generally preferred when the condition is resistant to topical treatments. Intense pulsed light (IPL) is a light therapy that is both effective for epidermal and dermal melasma as well as vascular components, due to its broad range of energy. Compared to lasers and other energy-based devices, IPL offers broader wavelength coverage, deeper penetration, and the capacity to treat larger surface areas with reduced risk of collateral tissue damage. In this review, we will discuss about IPL mechanism in melasma and studies in the literature about IPL efficacy in melasma including its use as monotherapy and in combination with other modalities. While IPL monotherapy shows moderate improvement, the literature predominantly consists of combination therapy studies, limiting the ability to isolate IPL's direct effectiveness. Future prospective studies with standardized protocols and extended follow-up are needed to define IPL's optimal role in the management of melasma.

Indexed as

Dermal melasmaepidermal melasmahyperpigmentationintense pulsed lightmelasma

Identifiers

PMID41585833
PMCPMC12830011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.