ArticleIndian journal of dermatology
A Comparative Study on the Measurement Properties (Criterion Validity, Informativity, and Floor and Ceiling Effects) of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-29.
Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing the measurement properties, informativity and responsiveness of the DLQI, DLQI-Relevant (DLQI-R), and Skindex-29 in patients with chronic skin disease: a prospective cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is essential in dermatology, with the DLQI and Skindex-29 being popular tools for assessment. However, the literature comparing the measuring features of these two questionnaires is lacking. Aims: This study aims to provide a comparison of the measurement properties of DLQI and Skindex-29 in patients with common dermatology conditions such as psoriasis vulgaris (PV), vitiligo vulgaris (VV), leprosy, and acne vulgaris (AV). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the HRQoL of 301 patients with the four dermatological conditions was measured using the DLQI and Skindex-29 questionnaires at a tertiary care centre located in Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. Statistical analysis included determining ceiling and floor effects, informativity, and criterion validity. Results: The mean DLQI total scores were: PV (11.03 ± 0.89), VV (4.73 ± 0.78), leprosy (8.97 ± 1.09), and AV (7.79 ± 0.63), and the mean Skindex-29 scores were: PV (37.98 ± 2.82), VV (27.92 ± 2.93), leprosy (45.12 ± 3.63), and AV (27.6 ± 1.08), with a 95% confidence interval. Of the patients with a DLQI score of 0 (n = 66), 64 (96%) had a total score greater than 0 on the Skindex-29. The most troubled areas of HRQoL among patients with a DLQI score of 0 according to the Skindex-29 were item 17 (showing affection; 12.1%), item 9 (worry about scars; 9.1%), item 12, item 13, and item 14 (being ashamed, worrying about worsening, and tending to do things oneself; 7.6%). The ceiling effect was observed in 4.7% of patients for DLQI and 0% for Skindex-29. The floor effect was high for the DLQI total score (22%), whereas Skindex-29 observed only 0.7%. The absolute informativity value of Skindex-29 was 1.66, and that of the DLQI was 1.92. The typical relative informativity value for both was 0.83. Conclusion: Skindex-29 showed better sensitivity to clinical severity, less floor effect, higher absolute informativity, and better coverage of the 'emotion' domain. Skindex-29 was found to be more effective in detecting minor HRQoL impairment than DLQI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.