Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585803›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Development and external validation of models to improve prediction of osteoporosis in elderly women: interpretable machine learning.

Tian Tang, Shiwen Wang, Shengziyi Cai, Yun Hu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tian TangDepartment of Geriatrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Shiwen WangDepartment of Geriatrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Shengziyi CaiDepartment of Geriatrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yun HuDepartment of Geriatrics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As populations age and the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) increases, osteoporotic fractures substantially raise disability and mortality and impose growing economic burdens, threatening health and quality of life. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a reliable, practical machine learning model to predict OP in older women using routine clinical test results and comorbidity data. Methods: We retrospectively assembled an internal dataset from NHANES (2003-2020) and randomly split it 70:30 into training and test sets. An external cohort from a Chinese tertiary hospital was used for validation. Predictors were selected using LASSO in the training set. Five algorithms (XGBoost, SVM, RF, LightGBM, and Naive Bayes) were tuned, and model performance was evaluated on the test set and in the external cohort. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess calibration and clinical net benefit. Feature contributions were quantified with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). Results: Among 3,950 women in the internal dataset, 833 (21.1%) had OP; in the external cohort (n=338), 167 (49.4%) had OP. SHAP ranked predictors (high to low) as: age, drinking, diabetes, eGFR, HbA1c, BMI, HDL, TG, BUN, and TBIL. After hyperparameter tuning, RF achieved an AUC of 0.805 in the internal test set and 0.740 in the external cohort; in the internal test set, accuracy was 0.82, precision 0.83, and specificity 0.97. Calibration was acceptable, and DCA indicated clinical utility across relevant thresholds. Conclusion: A random forest model using readily available clinical data predicts osteoporosis risk in older women with robust internal and external performance. The deployed model outputs calibrated probabilities at the patient level, provides case level explanations using SHAP, and supports dynamic rescoring as new routine results become available, enabling individualized risk management in routine care.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoporosisAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsdiabetes mellituselderly womenmachine learningosteoporosispredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41585803
PMCPMC12827086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.