ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Predictors of miscarriage in polycystic ovary syndrome patients with threatened abortion: development and validation of a nomogram model.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a machine learning model for predicting early pregnancy in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Coagulation dysfunction as an independent predictor of early pregnancy loss in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a machine learning-based retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic role of low molecular weight heparin and fat-soluble vitamins in pregnancy-associated prethrombotic conditions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the risk factors associated with failed pregnancy maintenance in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) presenting with threatened abortion. Methods: Based on clinical diagnostic outcomes, 150 PCOS patients with early threatened abortion (gestational age ≤12 weeks) were categorized into two groups: a successful pregnancy maintenance group (n=100) and a failed pregnancy maintenance group (n=50). Relevant clinical parameters were collected, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for failed pregnancy maintenance. A nomogram prediction model was constructed using R software (version 4.21). The discriminative ability of the nomogram was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and a calibration curve was generated to assess model performance. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was employed to determine clinical utility. Results: The nomogram prediction model identified the following independent risk factors for failed pregnancy maintenance in PCOS patients (P < 0.05): testosterone levels, fasting insulin, and fasting blood glucose. These factors were incorporated into the final nomogram. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) ranged from 0.635 to 0.955, indicating strong discriminative power. The calibration curve closely approximated the ideal curve, demonstrating excellent model fit. Furthermore, decision curve analysis revealed that the model's clinical utility was superior to extreme scenarios, confirming its practical value. Conclusion: Three clinical variables were independently associated with failed pregnancy maintenance in PCOS patients with threatened abortion. The developed prediction model, based on these variables, exhibits high accuracy and clinical applicability, providing a reliable tool for risk stratification and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.