ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Stent-Assisted Coiling Versus Balloon-Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide-Necked Aneurysms: A 2-Center Experience.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Woven EndoBridge versus stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of ruptured wide-necked aneurysms: A multicentric experience.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Article
- Balloon inflation predicts recanalization of intracranial aneurysms treated with coiling alone.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Comparison of Angiographic Outcomes of Woven EndoBridge and Balloon-Assisted Coiling for the Treatment of Ruptured Wide-Necked Aneurysms: A Multicentric Study.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Endovascular Treatment of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience from a Developing Country.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balloon-assisted coiling (BAC) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC) have been established as feasible approaches to manage ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Antiplatelet medications used with SAC theoretically increase risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. This study aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of SAC versus BAC for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Methods: We performed a 2-center retrospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with SAC or BAC for ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms from 2015 to 2020. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics were collected. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were radiographic aneurysm occlusion at follow-up and functional status at 3 months. Safety outcomes included periprocedural hemorrhagic/ischemic complications and symptomatic ventriculostomy tract and cerebrospinal shunt hemorrhage rates. Univariable and multivariable analyses with multiple imputations to account for follow-up loss were performed. Results: A total of 112 and 109 patients underwent SAC and BAC, respectively. Median cohort age was 56 years, and 72% were female. Baseline characteristics were similar. Hydrocephalus rate was higher in the SAC group (78% versus 64%; Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SAC may be as safe as BAC for the acute management of ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms without significant risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.