Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585759›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Value of Thrombus Imaging Characteristics as a Guide for First-Line Endovascular Thrombectomy Device in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Nikki Boodt, Agnetha A E Bruggeman, Manon Kappelhof, Sanne J den Hartog, Nerea Arrarte Terreros, Jasper M Martens, Reinoud P H Bokkers, Pieter-Jan van Doormaal, Charles B L M Majoie, Wim H van Zwam and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nikki BoodtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Agnetha A E BruggemanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Manon KappelhofDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Sanne J den HartogDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Nerea Arrarte TerrerosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Jasper M MartensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem The Netherlands.
Reinoud P H BokkersMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology Groningen University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Pieter-Jan van DoormaalDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) Maastricht University Medical Center Maastricht The Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-3515
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam Rotterdam The Netherlands.
MR CLEAN Registry Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that selection of a first-line endovascular thrombectomy device, that is, contact aspiration (CA) or stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy, could be based on thrombus type. Thrombus composition and mechanical behavior can partially be predicted with thrombus computed tomography (CT) characteristics. We aimed to assess the influence of thrombus CT characteristics on the association between first-line device and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy. Methods: For patients enrolled in the MR CLEAN (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in The Netherlands) Registry between March 2014 and November 2017, we assessed thrombus density, thrombus length, and presence of hyperdense artery sign on thin-slice (≤2.5 mm) admission CT. We used regression models to estimate the relationship between first-line endovascular thrombectomy device (CA versus stent retriever) and first-pass reperfusion (FPR, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2C-3 after first attempt), final reperfusion, procedure duration, 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and 90-day modified Rankin scale score and tested for interaction of thrombus characteristics with first-line device by adding interaction terms. Results: Of 703 included patients, 520 (74%) received first-line stent retriever and 183 (26%) first-line CA. Overall, the first-line device was not associated with FPR (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32 [95% CI, 0.88-1.98]). In patients with thrombus density below the median (<50 Hounsfield units), FPR was more often achieved with CA than with a stent retriever (34% versus 24%, aOR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.09-3.50]), whereas in patients with thrombus density above the median (≥50 Hounsfield units), first-line device was not associated with FPR (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.50-1.62]). The interaction between thrombus density as a continuous variable and first-line device on outcome was not significant ( Conclusion: Our study does not provide evidence that the association between first-line thrombectomy device and endovascular thrombectomy outcomes depends on thrombus CT characteristics. Based on our results, there are no arguments for thrombectomy device selection based on thrombus CT characteristics. A possible better performance of CA in low-density, fibrin-rich clots needs further study.

Indexed as

acute strokeaspirationstent retrieverthrombectomythrombus

Identifiers

PMID41585759
PMCPMC12778580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.