ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Arch and Great Vessel Geometry From a Transradial Angiographic Approach.
Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transradial versus transfemoral approach in cerebral angiography: A meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Anatomical and geometric considerations for transradial versus transfemoral approach to extracranial carotid artery stenting.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- Development of idealized human aortic models forFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroendovascular practices are transitioning from transfemoral to a radial-first approach for cerebral angiography. Developing radial-specific devices requires a comprehensive understanding of vessel size and geometry encountered from a right radial approach. We developed a database of aortic arch and vessel measurements relevant for radial-specific device development. Methods: The database contained 100 consecutive neck computed tomographic angiograms conducted on a 256-slice emergency department computed tomographic scanner. Arch characteristics and measurements obtained from 1-cm maximum intensity projection reformats included arch type and diameter, bifurcation angles, and distances from the arch to vessel origins. Statistical analysis was conducted using Excel and R. Results: The database contained 56 female and 44 male patients; the average age was 62 years. A total of 46% had type 2 or 3 arch configuration, 19% had bovine configuration, and 5% had a left vertebral artery originating directly from the arch. Median angles at the arch from the innominate ranged from 20° to 47° and at branch vessels from 16° to 63° with large variation. The left carotid bifurcation was ≈8 cm further than the right carotid bifurcation. The left vertebral artery origin was median 3.8 cm from the arch. Conclusions: We cataloged aortic arch and vessel geometries that have implications for catheter and device performance from a transradial approach. For example, a standard guide catheter that is adequate length for the right anterior circulation must be at least 8 cm longer for comparable distal support on the left because of the difference in distance from the right to the left. Catheter tip shape may be further optimized to improve vessel selection. Currently used catheters make a reverse curve angle of ≈15°, although most great vessels are at between 15° and 45°. Finally, the length of the distal arm of reverse curve catheters is just >4 cm, frequently inadequate to easily reach the left vertebral artery origin (median distance, 3.8 cm in this study). Transradial devices should be developed with these constraints in mind. This database provides benchmarks for future catheter design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.