ArticleACS omega2026
pH Sensitivity of the SERF1a Conformational Ensemble.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The MOAG-4/SERF class of proteins is a positive regulator of the aggregate formation of amyloid proteins that play an important role in the origin of numerous age-related diseases. In this class of proteins, previous structural studies showed that SERF1a is a very flexible protein, containing at least one α-helical region. The present work proposes the first description of the conformational space of SERF1a at two pH values (6 and 6.8) using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). SERF1a NMR conformations have been generated using the CYANA-FLYA procedure as well as the TAiBP (Threading-Augmented interval Branch-and-Prune) procedure, based on the systematic enumeration of protein conformations within an original distance geometry scheme. The generated conformations were filtered using Pepsi-SAXS by fitting small-angle X-ray experiments based on size exclusion chromatography (SEC-SAXS). At pH 6.8, a good fit of the SEC-SAXS curves was obtained for the CYANA and TAiBP NMR conformations, while at pH 6, analysis of the NMR conformations and the SEC-SAXS curves indicated that there could be a conformational exchange between a compact conformation displaying long-range nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs) between residues LYS-13 and THR-32, and slightly more extended conformations. The shortening of the C-terminal α-helix, as well as the destabilization of the N-terminal α-helix at acidic pH, may be related to the physiological function of SERF1a in the nucleoli. Interestingly, the N-terminal region of SERF1a displays numerous possible binding pockets, particularly in the region interacting with α-synuclein, detected by chemical shift perturbations. In general, the TAiBP procedure allows for a more expanded exploration of the SERF1a conformational space as well as for a description of the internal dynamics of SERF1a in agreement with NMR relaxation and with predictions from the protein primary sequence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.