ReviewACS omega2026
Transforming Cellulose for Sustainability: Comprehensive Insights into Modification Approaches and Their Applications.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Hydrogel-Based Sensors: Compositions, Fabrication, Sensing Mechanism, and Applications.Polymers · 2026Review
- Electrospun bi-layer carboxymethyl cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol/polycaprolactone nanofibers: fabrication, degradation, and phenytoin release kinetics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellulose, the most abundant natural biopolymer, has attracted significant attention due to its renewability, biodegradability, low toxicity, and specific tensile strength, enabling diverse applications across multiple sectors. Cellulose-based modified products have diverse applications in numerous fields, including pulp and paper, textiles, food, beverage, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and biomedical, energy storage, and environmental remediation. This review provides an in-depth and critical comparative evaluation of physical, biological, and chemical modification techniques, including esterification, etherification, oxidation, graft copolymerization, plasma treatment, ultraviolet treatment, ozone treatment, and enzymatic hydrolysis and highlights their influence on material properties and end-use performance. This transcendental work of literature with profuse illustrations has not been systematically presented in a single individual report in this field. Conclusively, by systematically analyzing the relationship between modification strategies and application-specific requirements, this review establishes a comprehensive roadmap for researchers, industry professionals, and academicians toward sustainable material innovations. Moreover, this work not only shares the in-depth knowledge with industrial relevance but also serves as a vital reference point for advancing next-generation biobased materials with improved performance and future interdisciplinary research in the field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.