Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585715›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Decoupling Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Addressing the Dark Adsorption Pitfall in Catalyst Ranking.

Anna Dougan-Bacha, Jordan E Cox, Sarah K St Angelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna Dougan-BachaDepartment of Chemistry, Dickinson College, 28 N. College Street, P.O. Box 1773, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, United States.
Jordan E CoxDepartment of Chemistry, Dickinson College, 28 N. College Street, P.O. Box 1773, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-0990
Sarah K St AngeloDepartment of Chemistry, Dickinson College, 28 N. College Street, P.O. Box 1773, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3294-7963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneous photocatalysis relies on the adsorption of the target molecule to the surface of the catalyst and the photocatalytic action of the material to degrade target molecules. In many reports, a 30 min dark adsorption time is used prior to exposure of the system to light and initiation of photocatalysis with no discussion of differences in adsorption rate or capacity when comparing catalystswhen adsorption rates or capacities are very different, misleading catalyst rankings may result. Even closely related materials, such as the ZnO-based photocatalysts discussed here, adsorb target molecules at different rates, have different adsorption capacities, and have apparently different photocatalytic rates. When typical methods for evaluating photocatalysts are used, the adsorption effects are not accounted for. Here, we illustrate potential concerns while evaluating photocatalysts and present a simple, low-concentration method to possibly addressand avoidadsorption effects. Interestingly, catalyst rankings change when adsorption effects are minimized by circumventing dark adsorption using the low concentration approach presented.

Identifiers

PMID41585715
PMCPMC12824761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.