ArticleACS omega2026
Decoupling Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Addressing the Dark Adsorption Pitfall in Catalyst Ranking.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heterogeneous photocatalysis relies on the adsorption of the target molecule to the surface of the catalyst and the photocatalytic action of the material to degrade target molecules. In many reports, a 30 min dark adsorption time is used prior to exposure of the system to light and initiation of photocatalysis with no discussion of differences in adsorption rate or capacity when comparing catalystswhen adsorption rates or capacities are very different, misleading catalyst rankings may result. Even closely related materials, such as the ZnO-based photocatalysts discussed here, adsorb target molecules at different rates, have different adsorption capacities, and have apparently different photocatalytic rates. When typical methods for evaluating photocatalysts are used, the adsorption effects are not accounted for. Here, we illustrate potential concerns while evaluating photocatalysts and present a simple, low-concentration method to possibly addressand avoidadsorption effects. Interestingly, catalyst rankings change when adsorption effects are minimized by circumventing dark adsorption using the low concentration approach presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.