Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585708›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Combined Cavitation and Plasma in Water and Wastewater RemediationA Review.

Pengyun Liu, Subramaniam Chidambaranathapillai, Zhilin Wu, Giancarlo Cravotto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengyun LiuDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, via P. Giuria 9, Turin 10125, Italy.
Subramaniam ChidambaranathapillaiDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, via P. Giuria 9, Turin 10125, Italy.
Zhilin WuCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key (Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint) Laboratory for Preparation and Application of Ordered Structural Materials of Guangdong Province, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
Giancarlo CravottoDepartment of Drug Science and Technology, University of Turin, via P. Giuria 9, Turin 10125, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7574-7350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As novel advanced oxidation processes, combined hydrodynamic cavitation (HC)/plasma and ultrasonic cavitation (UC)/plasma provide distinctive benefits for wastewater treatments, such as being minimal or free of additional additives, relevant fast processes with satisfactory outcomes, and maintaining biocell integrity while avoiding cytotoxin release, prolonged oxidation. A comprehensive review of hybrid processes is essential to recognizing the recent advances in this field, to improving awareness of the related mechanisms, and to guiding future work. Herein, this review presents the mechanisms, synergistic effects, the application, and the impact of critical factors of cavitation/plasma. Furthermore, environmental impacts are stated, and future perspectives are also recommended. Synergism occurred in both degradation and reactive species generation, indicating that cavitation/plasma systems represent one of the most effective hybrid technologies currently available for environmental water remediation.

Identifiers

PMID41585708
PMCPMC12824758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.