ArticleACS omega2026
Optimizing Molecular Descriptors for Reliable Adsorption Energy Prediction on Transition Metal Nanoclusters.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient catalytic processes are crucial for converting pollutant molecules into valuable products. Transition-metal nanoclusters show promise as a result of their tunable properties, but identifying active catalysts requires costly studies of the adsorption energetics. Machine learning offers a faster alternative, predicting adsorption energies when trained on suitable descriptors and relatively large density functional theory (DFT) data sets. This study evaluates the predictive power and transferability of two structural descriptors, the Coulomb matrix and the many-body tensor representation, on a diverse nanocluster-adsorbate data set using the random forest regression algorithm. Both descriptors achieved a mean absolute error of 0.05 eV in test data, but performance dropped significantly on an external generated set with unprecedented examples. Adding a simple electronic feature, the number of unpaired electrons of the adsorbate improved generalizability, even though with higher mean absolute errors compared to the original data set, highlighting the dependence on the training data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.