ArticleComputational urban science2026
Exploring contemporary public perceptions of historical redlining practices in the United States.
Article in Computational urban science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Redlining is a discriminatory practice of systematically denying loans or mortgages to residents in specific neighborhoods based on racial or ethnical composition. In current literature research, there is a lack of understanding of the public perceptions of impacts of historical redlining practices at large geographic scales. Although some social groups and organizations conducted surveys or interviews to obtain public perceptions of it on small groups of people in certain areas, our knowledge of the impacts of redlining is limited and may reflect bias. This study used geotagged tweets from 2011 to 2023 to investigate public perceptions of redlining practices in U.S. counties. Multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) was performed to explore both spatial heterogeneity and varying scales of associations between percentage of redlining-related geotagged tweets with negative sentiment and potential explanatory shaping factors in U.S. counties. Counties with a higher average household size, a higher percentage of people aged 45+, a lower homeownership rate, and a higher mobile home percentage have a significant association nationwide with more negative-sentiment expression in redlining-related tweets. However, counties with a lower insurance coverage are less likely to express negative sentiment in redlining-related tweets in some eastern U.S. counties, indicating a local significant association. The findings help people better understand the relationship between public perceptions of redlining practices and potential shaping factors. This study's methodology can also be applied to investigate public perspectives or perceptions on other controversial social topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.