ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Reciprocal regulation of rumen microbiota and epithelial genes in response to small peptide supplementation for feed efficiency in beef cattle.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum-inoculated silage improves milk fat in dairy goats by reprogramming rumen microbiota to promote pyruvate metabolism.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Beef cattle during the finishing phase are predominately fed with high-cereal diets to promote rapid growth, which commonly caused surplus energy supply and nitrogen deficiency, disrupted rumen energy and nitrogen balance (RENB), and reduced feed efficiency. This study aims to determine the effects of small peptide (SP) supplement on reciprocal patterns between rumen microbiota and epithelial genes in regulating nutrient metabolism and feed efficiency of beef cattle. Methods: A total of sixty 12-month-old Simmenthal male beef cattle with the non-significant initial body weight were randomly assigned into the control treatment and arithmetically increased SP additional (0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8% and 1.0%) treatments. Each treatment contains 10 bulls with each bull was considered as one replicate. Growth performances, nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentable parameters, rumen microbiota, and rumen epithelial gene expressions were detected to determine the effects of SP on beef cattle. Results and discussion: 0.6% and 0.8% of SP supplement showed the highest average daily weight gain (ADG), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility, and the lowest feed conversion ratio (FCR) among all treatments, which showed significant discrepancies compared with CON treatment (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.