Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585529›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Degradation kinetics and protein intestinal digestibility of tomato pomace in goats.

Yong Long, Siwaporn Paengkoum, Shengyong Lu, Xinran Niu, Sorasak Thongpea, Nittaya Taethaisong, Yong Han, Pramote Paengkoum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yong LongSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Siwaporn PaengkoumProgram in Agriculture, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Shengyong LuSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Xinran NiuSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Sorasak ThongpeaSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Nittaya TaethaisongSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Yong HanGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang, China.
Pramote PaengkoumSchool of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to analyze and compare the degradation kinetics and intestinal protein digestibility of soybean meal (SBM), whole tomato (WT), and tomato pomace (TP) in the rumen of goats. Methods: Three Boer goats were fitted with permanent rumen cannulas, and all samples were incubated Results: The results showed that the degradation rates of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF), as well as the effective degradability (ED) and a* values in WT were higher ( Conclusion: WT and TP exhibit a higher degradation rate in the rumen and better protein digestibility in the intestine.

Indexed as

degradation kinetic parametersintestinal digestibilityruminally cannulated goatsthree-step in vitro proceduretomato pomace

Identifiers

PMID41585529
PMCPMC12827183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.