Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585521›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Literature review of the use of Qualitative Behaviour Assessment with a fixed list of terms.

Irena Czycholl, Cecilie Ravn Skovlund, Björn Forkman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irena CzychollDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Cecilie Ravn SkovlundDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Björn ForkmanDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) is a method that is used to assess emotional states in animals, either based on a list of pre-established terms (fixed list; FL) or developed through Free-Choice-Profiling. Although FL QBA was originally developed for welfare assessment of farm animals, it is nowadays also used for various species and other sectors. This is, amongst others, because QBA contributes a unique 'whole-animal' insight into animal experience that complements other measures and its high feasibility along with a general lack of available indicators of positive emotional state. This has led to a number of different usages and applications of FL QBA of which an overview (e.g., exact methodology used, statistical analysis, purpose and aim) so far does not exist. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the studies that have applied FL QBA, the species it has been used for and the corresponding lists, what the QBA was used for (purpose), as well as about the various methodological approaches. Web of Science was searched between October 2023 and February 2024 for all peer-reviewed publications on FL QBA. 193 publications met inclusion criteria and were included for final review. The most common aim of use of QBA was on-farm welfare assessment, followed by measuring behavioural/emotional responses to specific events and temperament assessment/behavioural profiling. FL QBA was mainly identified for farmed animals (cattle, pigs, hens, sheep, goats, buffaloes and salmon) but also for working and companion animals (horses and donkeys, dogs and cats) as well as various exotic species in other contexts such as zoological institutions (brown bears, polar bears, elephants, dolphins, gorillas, peccaries and pampas deer). No FL QBA use was identified for laboratory animals. Methodological approaches varied greatly, including differences in term generation, observation methods (e.g., individual-vs. group observation and time spent observing), level of training and inter-observer reliability, and statistical analysis. Moreover, the level of reporting also varied greatly. In sum, this review provides a full overview of the current state of FL QBA including a list of all FL used which is important for the future development, refinement and standardisation of the method.

Indexed as

animal welfareemotional statefixed listpositive emotional stateQualitative Behaviour Assessmentwelfare assessment

Identifiers

PMID41585521
PMCPMC12827162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.