ArticleEnvironmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2026
Neighborhood walkability and sedentary behaviors among US adults.
Article in Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Erratum: Neighborhood walkability and sedentary behaviors among US adults: Erratum.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: It remains unclear whether individuals living in more walkable neighborhoods spend less time engaging in domain-specific sedentary behaviors, which vary by certain groups. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the associations between neighborhood walkability and total and domain-specific sedentary behavior, and to explore how this relationship varied by sociodemographic factors. Methods: Participants from AmeriSpeak who completed up to two activities completed over time in 24-hours in 2019 were included. Sedentary behavior outcomes (hours/day) included: (1) total sedentary behavior and (2) domain-specific sedentary behaviors (leisure, work, household, transport, personal, and other sedentary activities). Neighborhood walkability index was classified into four groups (least walkable [referent], below average, above average, and most walkable). Weighted generalized linear regression models were used to examine the associations, adjusting for covariates. Subsequently, such associations were stratified by sociodemographic factors. Results: Compared with the least walkable neighborhoods, below average, above average, and most walkable neighborhoods were positively associated with longer total sedentary behavior time (β = 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06, 1.01; β = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.29, 1.27; and β = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.75, 2.05, respectively). For domain-specific sedentary behavior, neighborhoods with below average, above average, and most walkable neighborhoods were positively related to work sedentary behavior. However, neighborhood walkability was not related to other domain-specific sedentary behaviors. Lastly, adults aged 20-39 living in more walkable neighborhoods spent longer total sedentary behavior and work-related sedentary behavior. Conclusion: Residents living in highly walkable neighborhoods engaged in more total sedentary behavior and work-related sedentary time. Future research should explore how neighborhood environments collectively influence sedentary behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.