Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585497›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Estimating the motor exploration in reinforcement learning.

Anja T Zai, Corinna Lorenz, Shakana Srikantharajah, Nicolas Giret, Richard H R Hahnloser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anja T ZaiInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Corinna LorenzInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Shakana SrikantharajahInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicolas GiretInstitut des Neurosciences Paris Saclay, UM CNRS, Université Paris Saclay, Saclay in Île-de-France, France.
Richard H R HahnloserInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What exploration strategies do animals use to learn motor skills? Reinforcement learning (RL) theory is a powerful framework to study motor learning, but provides no guidance for estimating motor exploration - the behavioral component aimed at discovering better strategies. We address this gap by taking inspiration from the brain's modular organization and postulating a latent learner that explores by injecting an additive source of ideal randomness into behavior. Assuming the learner is ignorant of other motor components, evolutionary fitness argues that these should display mainly non-ideal variability. We verify this behavioral decomposition in songbirds undergoing vocal pitch conditioning. The estimated vocal explorations account for the motor contribution of a cortico-basal ganglia pathway, while other components capture birds' suboptimal learning trajectories. Latent RL therefore provides a normative improvement over classical RL, making exploration explicit and suggesting that evolutionary pressure favors the randomness of exploration over strict behavioral optimality.

Indexed as

cognitive neuroscienceneurosciencesensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41585497
PMCPMC12829137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.