ArticleiScience2026
Estimating the motor exploration in reinforcement learning.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel intelligent hybrid reinforcement learning framework for autonomous decision making in complex health cognitive systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What exploration strategies do animals use to learn motor skills? Reinforcement learning (RL) theory is a powerful framework to study motor learning, but provides no guidance for estimating motor exploration - the behavioral component aimed at discovering better strategies. We address this gap by taking inspiration from the brain's modular organization and postulating a latent learner that explores by injecting an additive source of ideal randomness into behavior. Assuming the learner is ignorant of other motor components, evolutionary fitness argues that these should display mainly non-ideal variability. We verify this behavioral decomposition in songbirds undergoing vocal pitch conditioning. The estimated vocal explorations account for the motor contribution of a cortico-basal ganglia pathway, while other components capture birds' suboptimal learning trajectories. Latent RL therefore provides a normative improvement over classical RL, making exploration explicit and suggesting that evolutionary pressure favors the randomness of exploration over strict behavioral optimality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.