ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Effects of diffusion MRI spatial resolution on human brain short-range association fiber reconstruction and structural connectivity estimation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-compartment Myelin Streamline Decomposition reveals tract-specific and global brain network myelination in Multiple Sclerosis.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-range association fibers (SAFs) are critical for cortical communications but are often underestimated in conventional resolution diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) since they locate within a ~1.5 mm thin layer of superficial white matter. With the advent of high-resolution diffusion imaging techniques, this study evaluated the effects of image spatial resolution on SAF reconstruction using two datasets: (1) prospectively acquired dMRI data from 20 healthy subjects, each scanned at 3 resolutions (i.e., 2, 1.5, and 0.96 mm iso.), and (2) retrospectively down-sampled dMRI data from the Human Connectome Project dataset, as well as 20 representative MRtrix3-based tractography pipelines. It was found that lower resolution degraded superficial white matter model fitting, lowered the SAF streamline counts, and reduced global and regional short-range connectivity fraction (SCF), defined as the fraction of SAF connections among all association fiber connections, across all tested methods. Temporal lobe cortical regions exhibited the greatest SCF declines at lower resolutions. Tractography methods differed in resolution sensitivity, with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based single-tissue single-fiber tractography showing greater decreases in SCF than constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)-based multi-tissue multi-fiber tractography at lower resolutions. Probabilistic, anatomically constrained tractography combined with spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms was more robust to decreases in resolution. Up-sampling to a nominally higher resolution partially improved model fitting and SCF accuracy across the evaluated pipelines, with the greatest effect observed for DTI. Using the 0.96 mm iso. gSlider data and optimized tractography pipelines from this study, we constructed the first human brain atlas of RSCF. In summary, this study provides a systematic and quantitative evaluation using MRtrix3 of how spatial resolution, fiber models, and tracking methodologies affect SAF reconstruction and structural connectivity estimation, serving as a reference framework for methodological choices. These advances may enhance the characterization of both healthy and diseased human brains across a wide range of neuroscientific and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.