ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2025
Virtual Reality in U.S. Dental Education: A Cross-Sectional Study of Faculty and Student Perceptions.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immersive Virtual Reality for Patient Education in Orthodontics: Cross-Sectional Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to understand perceptions of faculty and student representatives on existing virtual reality (VR) technologies that are being integrated into U.S. dental school curriculum. Methods: Two validated (face and content) instruments were used for this cross-sectional study. National representatives (68 students and 68 Academic Deans) from U.S. dental schools were invited to participate in the Qualtrics surveys. The surveys were segmented into four parts: general information, knowledge about VR, institutional experience with VR, perception of VR's importance. Results: Faculty and student representatives from 30 dental schools (44%) participated in the study. Students and faculty unanimously agreed that VR technology should be integrated in the dental school curriculum. Some faculty with prior VR exposure perceived the greatest advantage of VR to be standardization and objectivity (55%, n=12). Students agreed with the faculty regarding the advantages of VR, but found the repeatability to be of greater importance (63%, n=5). The greatest limitation mentioned by faculty was cost, while students mentioned other limitations. Conclusion: The current study highlighted the differences and similarities in the faculty and students' perspective on the current use of VR in dentistry. The findings indicate that VR offers meaningful advantages for curricular integration, particularly by enabling standardized, objective assessment of learner performance and repeatable skill practice under controlled conditions. In the future, a mixed-methods study design is recommended to investigate further and to confirm the current findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.