Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585422›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2025

Sexual Dimorphism in Maxillary Canine Dimensions among Kosovo Population: A CBCT Analysis.

Vigan Aliu, Jehona Reçica Ahmedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vigan AliuDental School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pristina, Republic of Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4109-8166
Jehona Reçica AhmediDental School, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pristina, Republic of Kosovo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-6176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental sexual dimorphism, particularly in maxillary canines, is one of the most reliable markers for sex determination in forensic and anthropological contexts. With the advent of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), more accurate and population-specific morphometric data can be obtained. Objective: This study aimed to measure sexual dimorphism in maxillary canine crown sizes in the Kosovo population using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. It also assessed the potential for determining sex in forensic cases. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on CBCT scans from 60 subjects (30 males, 30 females) aged 18-30 years at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo. Mesiodistal (MD) and vestibularoral (VO) crown dimensions were measured. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Cohen's d effect sizes, and sexual dimorphism percentages calculated using the Garn and Lewis formula. Results: All parameters showed significant sexual dimorphism (p < 0.001), with males exhibiting larger crown sizes. The highest dimorphism was observed in the left canine VO dimension (8.92%), followed by the right canine VO (8.87%). Average sex differences ranged from 0.597-0.724 mm, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d: 1.166-1.435). Bilateral correlations were strong for both MD and VO measurements (r = 0.961-0.966). Conclusions: Maxillary canines exhibit pronounced sexual dimorphism in the Kosovo population, with VO dimensions showing slightly greater discriminatory potential than MD. These findings highlight their value in forensic sex determination and provide population-specific reference data for Kosovo.

Indexed as

CBCT, Kosovo populationCuspidForensic dentistryMaxillary canineMeSH Terms: Sex CharacteristicsSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID41585422
PMCPMC12826663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.