Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585421›Full record

ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2025

A Survey of Orthodontic Clear Aligner Practices among Orthodontists in Croatia.

Ana Marija Miličević, Luka Šimunović, Tea Popović, Tony Weir, Maurice J Meade, Senka Meštrović

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Marija MiličevićDepartment of Orthodontics, the University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5488-6915
Luka ŠimunovićDepartment of Orthodontics, the University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-6041
Tea PopovićResident, Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2316-723X
Tony WeirOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-2021
Maurice J MeadeOrthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-1079
Senka MeštrovićDepartment of Orthodontics, the University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-3579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to investigate clear aligner therapy (CAT) practices and protocols among orthodontic specialists in the Republic of Croatia. Materials and Methods: The modified version of a previously published questionnaire s was distributed online to 180 orthodontists. It included 46 open- and closed-ended questions across 11 sections, covering demographics, clinical use of CAT, aligner preferences, digital treatment planning (DTP), indications, protocols, interproximal reduction (IPR), refinements, retention, patient-reported issues, and overall perceptions. Respondents not using CAT were directed to a separate section on non-use. Results: The majority of respondents (88%) reported using CAT in clinical practice, although only 10% of their annual cases involved CAT. Adults were more common patient group (57.9%), and the main indication was mild to moderate crowding. Invisalign was the most frequently used aligner system (58.7%), primarily chosen for the quality of digital treatment planning (DTP) and sophistication of product features. Two-thirds of the respondents reported modifying the digital treatment plan, particularly by adjusting the final tooth position. Refinement was performed in 50% of the cases. IPR was included in 80% of the initial treatment plans and only 20% of the refinement phases. Finally, 52.6% of orthodontists considered CAT to be superior to conventional fixed appliance therapy. Conclusions: CAT is widely used by orthodontists in Croatia, primarily for mild cases. Nevertheless, aligners are still not perceived as producing superior outcomes compared with fixed appliances.

Indexed as

Clear aligner therapyMeSH terms: OrthodonticsOrthodonticsProfessional PracticeProtocolRemovable Orthodontic ApplianceSurvey

Identifiers

PMID41585421
PMCPMC12826669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.