Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585404›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Chinese Patients: Protocol for the ORIGINAL Study.

Xia Meng, Shuya Li, Hongguo Dai, Guozhi Lu, Weiwei Wang, Fengyuan Che, Yu Geng, Minghui Sun, Xiyan Li, Yongjun Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04915729 (A Phase III Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomised, Open Label, Blinded Endpoint), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04915729 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Multi-centre, Prospective, Randomised, Open Label, Blinded Endpoint (PROBE), Active-controlled Parallel Group Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Chinese Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Within 4.5 Hours After Stroke Onset

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoehringer IngelheimRan2021 to 2023Enrolled1,489ConditionsStrokeArmstenecteplase, alteplase
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xia MengDepartment of Neurology and Department of Clinical Trial Center Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Shuya LiDepartment of Neurology and Department of Clinical Trial Center Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Hongguo DaiDepartment of Emergency Linfen Central Hospital Linfen China.
Guozhi LuDepartment of Neurology Hexigten Banner Mongolian Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Chifeng China.
Weiwei WangDepartment of Neurology Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University Xianyang China.
Fengyuan CheDepartment of Neurology Linyi People's Hospital Linyi China.
Yu GengCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurology Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital Hangzhou China.
Minghui SunBoehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co., Ltd Shanghai China.
Xiyan LiBoehringer Ingelheim (China) Investment Co., Ltd Shanghai China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology and Department of Clinical Trial Center Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-2341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tenecteplase, a bioengineered variant of alteplase, is a new alternative thrombolytic agent. The ORIGINAL study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus standard care in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. Methods: This is a multicenter phase III study that employs a randomized (1:1), active-controlled, parallel-group, prospective, open-label, blinded-end point design. Adult participants (aged ≥18 years) with acute ischemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 hours of symptom onset according to current guideline recommendations are recruited from ≈55 neurology clinics/stroke centers throughout China. Results: The primary objective of the ORIGINAL study is to demonstrate the noninferiority of tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) to alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) on the basis of the proportion of patients who achieve a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 or 1 on day 90, that is, a favorable functional outcome. The prespecified noninferiority risk ratio margin is 0.937. Secondary end points include other functional outcomes and the following safety end points: adjudicated symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (up to 36 hours after the end of study drug administration) based on the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study III definition; all-cause death within 90 days; and the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale score of 5 or 6 on day 90. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the results of this study will contribute to the growing body of evidence for the noninferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase given within 4.5 hours of acute ischemic stroke symptom onset and support a new indication for tenecteplase in China. Clinical Trial Registration Information: NCT04915729 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729).

Indexed as

alteplaseChinesefunctional outcomeischemic strokesymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhagetenecteplase

Identifiers

PMID41585404
PMCPMC12778536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.