Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585388›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Rescue Stenting after Unsuccessful Recanalization of Endovascular Thrombectomy of the Posterior Circulation: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

Aaron Brake, Emmanuel Danso, William Liu, Vince Galate, Lane Fry, Michael Abraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron BrakeDepartment of Radiology Neurology University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4987-5815
Emmanuel DansoUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas City KS.
William LiuUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas City KS.
Vince GalateUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas City KS.
Lane FryUniversity of Kansas School of Medicine Kansas City KS.
Michael AbrahamUniversity of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City KS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of rescue stenting (RS) in acute ischemic strokes due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease-related large vessel occlusion is an area of active investigation. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RS under these circumstances. Methods: A systematic literature review, conforming to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and OVID databases. Common and random effects analyses were conducted to compare outcomes including modified Rankin Scale score, 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage between patients receiving and those not receiving RS after failed endovascular thrombectomy within posterior circulation. Results: Ten studies comprising 1202 patients (730 RS, 472 control) were analyzed. RS was associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional outcomes, evidenced by a higher proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 at 90 days (32.74% versus 21.19% in controls; Conclusion: RS for acute ischemic stroke in the context of intracranial atherosclerotic diseaserelated posterior circulation large vessel occlusion after failed endovascular thrombectomy is associated with improved functional outcomes, reduced mortality, and decreased symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates. These findings suggest RS as a beneficial intervention in this patient population. However, the retrospective nature of the included studies and their heterogeneity underline the need for further research, particularly through randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

posterior circulationrescuestentingstrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID41585388
PMCPMC12778538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.