Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585382›Full record

ArticleStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Do Deep Learning Algorithms Accurately Segment Intracerebral Hemorrhages on Noncontrast Computed Tomography? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Diana Zarei, Mahbod Issaiy, Shahriar Kolahi, David S Liebeskind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diana ZareiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.
Mahbod IssaiyAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.
Shahriar KolahiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) Tehran University of Medical Science Tehran Iran.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology University of California Los Angeles CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-8736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Stroke, a major global health issue, is broadly categorized into ischemic and hemorrhagic types. The volume of hemorrhage on noncontrast computed tomography guides the treatment options and hints at prognosis. Conventional approaches to calculate intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume, like the ABC/2 method, typically rely on an assumed standard shape and might be inaccurate. Advances in deep learning have significantly improved noncontrast computed tomography's capabilities in ICH volume estimation. This study conducts a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the precision of deep learning algorithms in delineating ICH on noncontrast computed tomography. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, was conducted on literature from 2000 to October 2023. Studies were selected on the basis of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Performance evaluation was done using the Dice Similarity Coefficient, and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used for quality assessment. Statistical analysis was carried out using Stata 17.0. Results: The review included 28 studies, mainly retrospective cohorts, with a focus on convolutional neural network architectures, particularly U-Net variants. A meta-analysis of 14 studies revealed a combined Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88). Performance was consistent across various methodologies but varied on the basis of ICH pathogenesis, with spontaneous ICH having higher accuracy. Conclusion: Deep learning models are highly effective in segmenting ICH on noncontrast computed tomography, demonstrating potential improvements in clinical neuroimaging. Despite their efficacy, challenges in segmenting smaller hemorrhages remain. The findings suggest that deep learning could reduce health care professional workloads and enhance patient care, although further research is needed to address limitations and extend clinical utility.

Indexed as

computed tomographydeep learningintracerebral hemorrhagemeta‐analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41585382
PMCPMC12778524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.