ArticleDigital health
YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok serve as important stroke-relevant information sources: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about amblyopia on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Stroke remains a huge disease burden source on a global scale due to its high prevalence rate and mortality. Social media platforms serve as significant health-relevant information dissemination channels. However, the role of social media platforms in stroke-relevant information spread has not been established well. The aim of this study is to explore the role of social media platforms in stroke-relevant information spread. Methods: To conduct this cross-sectional study, stroke-related videos were collected from YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok. The quality of included videos was assessed by using the Global Quality Scale (GQS), Results: A total of 300 stroke-relevant videos were included for further analysis (YouTube 100; Bilibili 100; TikTok 100). Mean JAMA scores of YouTube videos, Bilibili videos, and TikTok videos were 2.51, 2.62, and 2.76, respectively. Mean GQS scores of YouTube videos, Bilibili videos, and TikTok videos were 3.11, 2.79, and 2.60, respectively. Mean Modified DISCERN score of YouTube videos, Bilibili videos, and TikTok videos were 3.00, 2.88, and 2.78, respectively. No significant difference was found in quality scores across the three platforms. Content analysis suggested that all included videos demonstrated good performance in terms of accuracy and evidence support. Personal experience, health professionals, science communications, general users, news agencies, and nonprofit organizations were identified as potential positive factors for better viewers' level of enjoyment. The video playback time was negatively correlated with the viewers' level of enjoyment. Conclusion: Social media platforms facilitate the spread of stroke-relevant information. To enhance viewer engagement, regardless of the platform, video creators should strive to make their videos more concise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.