ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Artificial intelligence and multimodal imaging in orthopaedics: from technological advances to clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi‑omics integration in osteoarthritis: Unraveling cell‑type‑specific gene‑metabolite networks for precision medicine (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Current Evidence and Clinical Translation Across the Patient Care Pathway.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- High Accuracy, Questionable References: Large Language Models' Performance and Citation Reliability in Foot and Ankle Surgery Examinations.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Fracture Detection in Orthopedic and Trauma Imaging: Where It Works, Where It Fails, and Principles for Safe Clinical Deployment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of multimodal medical imaging with artificial intelligence (AI) is potentially catalysing a paradigm shift in orthopaedic diagnosis and treatment, moving beyond experience-based practices toward intelligent, data-driven precision medicine. This narrative review synthesizes recent key evidence across imaging modalities and AI frameworks, and highlights the translational gap that persists between algorithmic development and real-world clinical implementation. By combining complementary information from X-ray, CT, MRI, PET, ultrasound, and biochemical data, multimodal AI overcomes the inherent limitations of single-modality approaches, enabling more comprehensive structural, functional, and metabolic assessments. Recent advances demonstrate broad applications, including accurate fracture detection and classification, differentiation of benign and malignant bone tumours, quantitative assessment of osteoarthritis, risk prediction for osteoporosis, and intelligent preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation. Moreover, multimodal AI facilitates efficacy prediction and personalised treatment decision-making, positioning future systems as AI-assisted decision-support tools that support surgeons in surgical strategy, implant design, and long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain, particularly in data heterogeneity, model generalisation, interpretability, and clinical integration. Progress in constructing standardised multimodal databases, developing self-supervised and multi-task learning strategies, and strengthening ethical-regulatory frameworks will be essential for clinical translation. Ultimately, multimodal AI holds immense potential to transition from laboratory validation to routine practice, delivering safer, more efficient, and precise diagnostic and therapeutic solutions for orthopaedic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.