SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
From radiomics to transformers in pancreatic cancer detection and prognosis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven saliency-guided retinal vessel segmentation framework for sustainable digital pathology.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest malignancies, primarily due to late diagnosis and poor therapeutic response. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in medical imaging and multi-modal data integration, have created new opportunities for improving early detection and personalized prognostication. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. The protocol was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework, covering studies published between 2015 and 2025. Results: Distinct from prior surveys that focus narrowly on specific algorithms or data types, this work introduces a generational taxonomy of AI approaches-ranging from classical radiomics-based machine learning to deep learning and contemporary transformer-based models-and maps their application to core clinical tasks such as detection, segmentation, classification, and outcome prediction. A key contribution is the integration of diverse datasets across imaging, pathology, and molecular sources; we further assess trends in availability, usage, and sample scale. Discussion: We critically evaluate limitations in generalizability, external validation, model calibration, and translational readiness, and outline recommendations for multi-center validation, standardized reporting, domain adaptation, and clinician-centered interpretability. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2DVHJ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.