Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41585240›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Supporting postgraduate exam preparation with large language models: implications for traditional Chinese medicine education.

Baifeng Wang, Meiwei Zhang, Zhe Wang, Keyu Yao, Meng Hao, Junhui Wang, Suyuan Peng, Yan Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Baifeng WangDongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meiwei ZhangSchool of Medical Informatics, Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Zhe WangInstitute of Medical Informatics, Statistics,and Epidemiology,Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Keyu YaoInstitute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Meng HaoInstitute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junhui WangGuang'anmen Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Suyuan PengInstitute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhuInstitute of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In China, the medical education system features multiple co-existing levels, with higher education often leading to better job prospects. In career advancement-especially for entry into competitive urban hospitals-the postgraduate examination often plays a more decisive role than the licensing examination. The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has rapidly expanded. TCM theories possess distinct scientific features, requiring LLMs to demonstrate advanced information processing and comprehension abilities in a Chinese context. While LLMs have shown strong performance in many countries' licensing examinations, their performance in selective TCM examinations remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of Ernie Bot, ChatGLM, SparkDesk, and GPT-4 on the 2023 Chinese Postgraduate Examination for TCM (CPE-TCM), and explore their potential in supporting TCM education and academic development. Methods: We assessed the performance of four LLMs using the 2023 CPE-TCM as a test set. Exam scores were calculated to evaluate subject-specific performance. Additionally, responses were qualitatively analyzed based on logical reasoning and the use of internal and external information. Results: Ernie Bot and ChatGLM achieved accuracy rates of 50.30 and 46.67%, respectively, both above the passing score. Statistically significant differences in subject-specific performance were observed, with the highest scores in the medical humanistic spirit module. ChatGLM and GPT-4 provided logical explanations for all responses, while Ernie Bot and SparkDesk showed logical reasoning in 98.2 and 43.6% of responses, respectively. ChatGLM and GPT-4 incorporated internal information in all explanations, whereas SparkDesk rarely did. Over 60% of responses from Ernie Bot, ChatGLM, and GPT-4 included external information, which did not significantly differ between correct and incorrect answers. In SparkDesk, the presence of internal or external information was significantly associated with answer correctness ( Discussion: Ernie Bot and ChatGLM surpassed the passing threshold for postgraduate selection, reflecting solid TCM expertise. LLMs demonstrated strong capabilities in logical reasoning and integration of background knowledge, highlighting their promising role in enhancing TCM education.

Indexed as

ChatGLMErnie BotGPT-4large language models (LLMs)medical educationSparkDesktraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID41585240
PMCPMC12827181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.